Move from an SEO finding to a reviewable code change.
Connect an approved repository, prepare repairs in an isolated workspace, review the diff, and create a draft PR or MR.
The customer authorizes a repository and chooses the project used for remediation.
Inspect proposed files, validation output, risk controls, and the draft change set.
Run the audit again after deployment and compare the same scoring inputs.
Agentic SEO connects diagnosis with implementation. Index Instrument turns supported audit findings into a proposed change set, validates the work in an isolated environment, and waits for customer approval before opening a draft pull request or merge request. The live site is not changed by the preparation step.
The agent works from evidence, not a generic checklist
A remediation task begins with a finding that has supporting URL or file evidence. The system maps the issue to the connected codebase, prepares a limited change, and records what it did. Findings that cannot be mapped safely stay in the report for manual review.
This is deliberately narrower than asking a coding agent to “fix SEO.” A constrained task is easier to inspect, test, approve, and reverse.
Preparation happens away from production
The agent clones the approved repository into an isolated workspace, creates a separate branch, and runs the available checks for the project. The remediation screen shows progress and explains why each step is needed.
When the change is ready, the customer reviews the files and validation result. Approval creates a draft PR or MR. GitHub draft pull requests cannot be merged until someone marks them ready for review, which adds another explicit control in the repository workflow.
- No repository connection is created without OAuth approval.
- No live deployment is part of sandbox preparation.
- The proposed diff stays visible before repository handoff.
- A rejected change is removed from the active remediation view.
- Closed remediation work can clean up its branch and return the workflow to an earlier step.
Non-developers still need a clear decision
The main screen explains what is wrong, what the agent plans to change, and what risk remains. Technical logs and commands stay behind a detail view for the developer who needs them.
The highest current plan adds Human Review for ambiguous codebases, deployment coordination, or changes that need an experienced specialist. The agent remains useful, but a person owns the judgment call.
One process with visible approval points.
Approve repository access
Connect GitHub or GitLab and choose the repository and base branch.
Prepare in isolation
Clone the project, create a working branch, and apply the scoped repair.
Validate and inspect
Review checks, changed files, execution details, and the expected score change.
Create the draft
Approve a draft PR or MR, then decide when or whether it should be merged.
What customers control.
Why does the system create a pull request?
A pull request makes the proposed files, commits, checks, and review discussion visible before the change enters the base branch. It also gives the customer a standard place to accept, revise, or close the work.
Can the agent commit directly?
Direct changes require an explicit customer choice and suitable repository permissions. The safer default is a separate branch and draft PR or MR.
What happens if I reject a remediation?
The change is not merged or deployed. The workflow can close the draft, remove the working branch where permitted, and return the remediation to an earlier state.
Check the site before deciding how much work it needs.
Quick Scan gives you a free baseline. A paid audit opens the complete findings and remediation plan.
Run a free Quick Scan